<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Early Royal Trader results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ea-reviews.com/the-forex-robot-world-cup/early-royal-trader-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ea-reviews.com/the-forex-robot-world-cup/early-royal-trader-results/</link>
	<description>The quest to find the best Forex trading robots</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 17:11:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yosi</title>
		<link>http://ea-reviews.com/the-forex-robot-world-cup/early-royal-trader-results/comment-page-1/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Yosi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 20:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ea-reviews.com/?p=600#comment-97</guid>
		<description>I also believe one should be prudent even with this serious analysis of EAs. 8 weeks is just not enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also believe one should be prudent even with this serious analysis of EAs. 8 weeks is just not enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strider</title>
		<link>http://ea-reviews.com/the-forex-robot-world-cup/early-royal-trader-results/comment-page-1/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Strider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 06:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ea-reviews.com/?p=600#comment-96</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comments. You are a braver man than I if you are already on a live account with any of the FRWC robots. I do think the competition results that the FRWC posted were legitimate, but I think some questions still remain. After all, two months is a fairly short test in the world of Forex trading. Now if I can add a month or two of successful trading results on top of the two months the FRWC had with these robots, that will give me confidence to put real money on them.

I read somewhere that the FRWC competition was actually run by the FAP Turbo and Megadroid developers. I do not know if this is true or not, and I have no way to find out. But if it is true, I see it as both good and bad. It&#039;s good in the sense that FAP Turbo and Megadroid are two of the more popular and successful robots on the market, so those guys seem pretty legitimate. But, on the other hand, it would kind of leave a bad taste in your mouth considering how the FRWC has spoken so poorly of all the commercial EAs and how they are illegitimate and rip-offs. That would kind of smack of hypocrisy of the highest order. But who knows? Maybe the FT and MD folks have nothing to do with it. If anyone knows more on this, I&#039;d love to hear it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments. You are a braver man than I if you are already on a live account with any of the FRWC robots. I do think the competition results that the FRWC posted were legitimate, but I think some questions still remain. After all, two months is a fairly short test in the world of Forex trading. Now if I can add a month or two of successful trading results on top of the two months the FRWC had with these robots, that will give me confidence to put real money on them.</p>
<p>I read somewhere that the FRWC competition was actually run by the FAP Turbo and Megadroid developers. I do not know if this is true or not, and I have no way to find out. But if it is true, I see it as both good and bad. It&#8217;s good in the sense that FAP Turbo and Megadroid are two of the more popular and successful robots on the market, so those guys seem pretty legitimate. But, on the other hand, it would kind of leave a bad taste in your mouth considering how the FRWC has spoken so poorly of all the commercial EAs and how they are illegitimate and rip-offs. That would kind of smack of hypocrisy of the highest order. But who knows? Maybe the FT and MD folks have nothing to do with it. If anyone knows more on this, I&#8217;d love to hear it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TradeRunner</title>
		<link>http://ea-reviews.com/the-forex-robot-world-cup/early-royal-trader-results/comment-page-1/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>TradeRunner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 20:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ea-reviews.com/?p=600#comment-95</guid>
		<description>I appreciate your work and &quot;common sense&quot; comments on the FRWC EA&#039;s
I&#039;m running the Fusion on a live account because I thought if anyone could put together a good EA it would be &#039;those people&#039;.
Well... so far so good but with some of those 10 or 12 pip T/P&#039;s with a 200 pip S/L I&#039;m just not sure yet if FRWC isn&#039;t just as full of crap as most of the other &quot;EA peddlers&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate your work and &#8220;common sense&#8221; comments on the FRWC EA&#8217;s<br />
I&#8217;m running the Fusion on a live account because I thought if anyone could put together a good EA it would be &#8216;those people&#8217;.<br />
Well&#8230; so far so good but with some of those 10 or 12 pip T/P&#8217;s with a 200 pip S/L I&#8217;m just not sure yet if FRWC isn&#8217;t just as full of crap as most of the other &#8220;EA peddlers&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
